Written by Canterbury Law Group

First Degree Murder and Second Degree Murder Overview

First Degree Murder and Second Degree Member

Second-degree murder is typically characterized by a lack of premeditation, the aim to do only bodily injury, and a severe disregard for human life. The precise legal definition of this offense varies by jurisdiction. Some states may not use the word “second-degree murder,” but they likely still divide murder into two degrees and inflict less punishments for the lesser offense.

Read on to discover the many types of killings that are typically categorized as second-degree murder, along with examples of each form of killing.

Without Premeditation Intentional Murders

These kind of murders require no strategy on the side of the perpetrator. At the time of the murder, the killer intended to kill the victim, whereas before to the murder, the perpetrator had no intention to commit murder.

For instance, Adam and Bill are neighbors, and they’ve been arguing about the fence separating their houses recently. Adam pays Bill a visit to discuss the issue, and while there, he suddenly grabs the shotgun hanging above the fireplace and fatally shoots Bill.

Adam did not intend to murder Bill when he went to Bill’s residence on that day, so there was no premeditation. Adam had every intention of murdering Bill at the time he squeezed the trigger. Prosecutors would likely prosecute him with second-degree murder under these conditions.

If, on the other hand, Adam murders Bill during a sudden argument that was provoked, he would likely be charged with manslaughter. The premise is that if Adam is motivated by “hot of passion,” the moral responsibility is less.

Intent to Inflict Only Serious Physical Harm

The second circumstance for second-degree murder is when the criminal wants to cause merely substantial bodily damage but is aware that death may ensue from the conduct. Adam grabs a shovel and whacks Bill in the head with all of his power instead of shooting him in the situation described above. Adam did not plan to murder Bill when he struck him with the shovel, but he was aware that a blow to the head carried a high risk of death. Adam’s killing of Bill in this manner would be categorized as second-degree murder.

Extreme Callousness Towards Human Life

The third major type of second-degree murder happens when a victim dies due to the perpetrator’s excessive disregard for human life. Extreme indifference typically entails a complete disregard for the chance that an action would harm someone.

Consider, returning to Adam and Bill, that instead of bashing Bill over the head with a shovel, Adam pulls a rifle and fires wildly at a throng of neighbors who have gathered to watch Adam and Bill argue. Adam didn’t necessarily intend to kill anyone, but he also didn’t consider the harm he could inflict to those in the crowd. This is evidence of Adam’s terrible disregard for human life. If one of Adam’s bullets impacted and killed a member of the crowd, Adam has likely committed second-degree murder.

Felony Murder

Some states additionally consider homicides that occur during the commission of another felony as second-degree murders, although other states classify such homicides as first-degree murders. It is also crucial to know that a person might be convicted of felony murder even if they did not kill somebody themselves.

For instance, if Adam and Bill enter a convenience store with the intention of robbing it at gunpoint (which is a felony), and Adam ends up shooting the store owner, a jury could find Bill (who did not shoot anyone) guilty of murder on the grounds that he was involved in the original felony when the killing occurred.

What If You Are Charged with Second-Degree Murder? Call a Lawyer

If you have been accused of any form of murder or other crime, hire a competent attorney immediately to safeguard your legal rights, assist you in establishing a defense, and preserve evidence that may be helpful to your case. Contact a local criminal defense attorney immediately to get started.

Need A Criminal Defense Lawyer In Scottsdale or Phoenix?

Canterbury Law Group’s criminal defense lawyers in Phoenix and Scottsdale will defend your case with personal attention and always have you and your best interests in mind when offering legal solutions. Call today for an initial consultation! We handle criminal defense cases in all areas of Phoenix including Mesa, Tempe, Chandler, Maryville, Apache Junction, and more.

We are experienced criminal defense attorneys and will fight for you to obtain the best possible outcome. Our firm will rigorously represent you, so you can get on with your life. Call today for an initial consultation! 480-744-7711 or [email protected]

*This information is not intended to be legal advice. Please contact Canterbury Law Group today to learn more about your personal legal needs.

Written by Canterbury Law Group

What Happens to Liens and Secured Debts in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy?

What Happens to Liens in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy?

In bankruptcy, your personal obligation to pay a secured debt may be discharged, but the lien remains in place.

A creditor’s lien typically endures Chapter 7 bankruptcy. If the debtor doesn’t make the agreed-upon payments while the lien is active, the creditor may seize the property once the bankruptcy process is over.

How Do Liens Work?

Nobody hates to lose money, not even lenders, and when a loan is required to make a large purchase like a house or car, the danger of loss is greater still. By forcing the borrower to acknowledge that the creditor may seize the collateralized property if the debt is not paid as agreed, lenders reduce this risk. This contract grants the creditor a “lien,” or ownership stake in the property.

When a lender recovers property, they often auction it off and apply the money to the outstanding loan sum. In most situations, the borrower will still be liable for the remaining sum, or “deficiency balance,” if the auction price is less than what is owing.

Remember that in some states, shortfall balances on particular transactions are not permitted. A deficit balance will also be eliminated in Chapter 7 bankruptcy; see more below.

“Secured Debt” is created via Liens in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

You must classify your debts as either secured or unsecured if you have already begun putting together your bankruptcy petition. A loan with a charge against it? It is locked. No liens? It’s unprotected.

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Voluntary and Involuntary Liens

If the lien is voluntary, it was put on your property with your consent; if it is involuntary, it was done so against your will. Why is this important? because you might be unaware that a creditor has a secured debt against you and that you have a lien on your property.

Liberties Liens

In the course of a mortgage or vehicle note transaction, it’s typical to consent to granting a lien to a creditor. You are probably aware that the creditor’s lien could cause you to lose your home to foreclosure or your car to repossession because you agreed to those terms when you financed the property.

But when buying items like jewelry, furniture, electronics, beds, equipment, and computers on credit, many people are unaware that they are agreeing to a lien. Check your agreement or invoice.

Statutory Liens Without Consent

It’s common to have liens placed against your property without being aware of them because certain creditors have the legal authority to do so without your knowledge.

For instance, if you don’t pay your tax due, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may place a lien on your property. If you don’t pay your dues, your homeowners’ association may place a lien on your home. Or, if you don’t pay for repairs, a contractor could put a lien on your house.

Liens for Involuntary Judgments

By filing a lawsuit against the borrower and utilizing the money judgment to put a lien on your property, some creditors can convert an unsecured debt into a secured debt.

Medical bills, credit card balances, and other unsecured debt are all considered judicial liens.
After an unsecured creditor obtains a judicial lien and transforms into a secured creditor, many people apply for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

By filing a lawsuit against a borrower, succeeding, and obtaining a “money judgment” against the borrower for the amount owing plus fees and costs, a creditor can establish a “judicial” or “judgment” lien. A money judgment holder may register it against the borrower’s real estate.

Any property owned by the borrower that is not real estate is considered personal property, and in some states, the money judgment immediately grants the creditor a lien on that property.

How to Obtain a Money Judgment as an Unsecured Creditor

The procedure begins when the debtor is unable to make a payment on an unsecured obligation, like an outstanding credit card amount or overdue rent. You do not provide the creditor with collateral to secure these debts, thus the creditor cannot compel payment absent a judicial ruling.

A creditor will initiate a civil lawsuit if they feel that the debt is significant enough to warrant the expense of legal action. The court will issue a “default” money judgment and the creditor will be declared the winner if the borrower doesn’t reply.

If the borrower loses after submitting an answer to the complaint in the litigation, the court will also issue a money judgment. read about litigation that bankruptcy averted.

How a Money Judgment Becomes a Lien in the Mind of the Creditor

After receiving a monetary judgment, a creditor is deemed a “judgment creditor” and is required to “perfect” or establish an enforceable lien. Perfecting the lien often happens after the money judgment has been recorded at the recorder’s office or after adhering to other state legal requirements.

Advantages of a Perfected Lien

Once perfected, the lien will be paid out of the sale proceeds if the borrower sells real estate within the recorder’s authority (often the county). Before distributing money to the house seller, the title firm managing the transaction examines whether any recorded liens exist and pays them.

Personal property may also be encumbered by judicial liens. However, the majority of people have exemptions that allow them to defend their vehicles and home goods, therefore these targets are rarely used. Most states allow persons to use the same exemptions that are available in bankruptcy to safeguard property from creditors.

Use of Money Judgments by Creditors in Other Ways

A money judgment can be used by a judgment creditor for purposes other than creating liens. Most take use of money judgements to take money from the borrower’s bank account (bank levy) or take money out of their paycheck (wage garnishment).

How Are Liens Affected by Chapter 7 Bankruptcy?

This topic can be challenging to understand, but it can be summed up as follows:

Your need to pay a secured debt, such as a mortgage or car payment, will probably be eliminated if you file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
If you don’t pay what you owe, the creditor can still seize the collateral (the house, car, or other property) because Chapter 7 bankruptcy won’t remove a voluntary lien.
When a judgment lien prohibits you from benefiting from an exemption, you can seek the court to set it aside. For instance, you may seek the court to remove the lien on up to $15,000 of your property equity if an exemption allowed you to keep the remaining $15,000 of equity.

Why Liens Are Not Automatically Eliminated by Chapter 7

After Chapter 7, a creditor cannot pursue you for a debt that has been discharged by your bankruptcy since filing for bankruptcy releases you from the obligation to pay. When a lien is in place and you don’t make the agreed-upon payments, Chapter 7 does not affect your obligation to return the property.

Therefore, even if the creditor cannot physically force you to pay your debt, if you refuse to do so voluntarily, the creditor may seize your property. This outcome results from the fact that a secured transaction includes two main components:

Your duty to reimburse the creditor. You are liable for paying the total debt. In the event that the debt is eligible for the bankruptcy discharge, filing for bankruptcy will discharge your personal duty for it. This implies that the creditor is prevented from subsequently filing a lawsuit against you to recover the debt and from using the judicial lien (discussed above) to garnish your earnings or deduct funds from your bank account.

The ability of the creditor to reclaim the collateral through the lien. Your creditor has the right to use the proceeds from the sale of the collateral used to secure the loan to offset any amounts you owe. If you don’t pay the loan, the lien enables the creditor to seize the property and force its sale. The lender has the right to sue you for the value of the collateral if it isn’t available. Even if you transfer ownership of the property to another party, a lien remains on it. A lien is not removed by bankruptcy on its own.
Example. Mary purchases a couch from a furniture retailer using credit. She agrees to pay for the couch over the following year by signing a contract. According to the contract, the couch has a security interest in favor of the creditor (the store), who has the right to reclaim it if any payment is more than 15 days overdue. In a secured debt of this kind, the lien is the store’s right to take back the couch, and Mary’s responsibility to pay the loan is her personal liability. She is no longer obligated to pay for the couch after filing for bankruptcy, but the creditor still has a lien on it and has the right to take it back if she doesn’t.

You might be able to take extra actions during bankruptcy to get rid of or at least lessen liens on collateral for security interests. See Avoiding Liens in Bankruptcy for further information.

Lenders Must Make Their Liens Perfect

A security interest agreement only counts as a secured debt for bankruptcy purposes if the creditor reports the lien with the proper municipal or state records office to “perfect” the lien. In order to establish a lien on real estate, for instance, the mortgage holder (the bank or another lender) normally needs to record the lien with the county’s recorder’s office.

The holder of a security interest must typically record it with the state or municipal agency that handles UCC recordings (also known as “UCC recordings”) in order to perfect a security interest in a vehicle or commercial asset. Typically, this is the secretary of state.

Why File for Bankruptcy Under Chapter 7?

Why then may declaring Chapter 7 bankruptcy be preferable than allowing the property or automobile to go through a foreclosure or repossession? It eliminates your need to repay the full loan, including any outstanding shortfall sum, is the solution.

Due to the fact that forgiven debt is treated as income, it may also occasionally preclude the assessment of a tax liability. For instance, if you permit the foreclosure of your home and the lender forgives the unpaid sum, you can be hit with a big tax payment at the end of the year.

In Chapter 7 bankruptcy, secured debts are handled differently than other debt types.

The majority of people have a loan that is backed by real estate, like a mortgage or a car loan. In Chapter 7 bankruptcy, these obligations, often known as secured debts, can be challenging. Even while the secured debt itself can be eliminated (discharged) and frequently is, the creditor will still retain the power to repossess the property if you fall behind on your payments (default).Your options in Chapter 7 bankruptcy will depend on whether you’re current on your loan payments and whether you wish to maintain any collateral for the loan, such as a house or a car.

A Secured Debt: What Is It?

Almost always, if you’re making payments on a piece of property, you’ve agreed that the asset will be used as security for the debt’s repayment. If you stop making payments, the creditor (or lender) may seize the home, sell it, and file a lawsuit against you (a deficiency judgment) to recover the difference between what you owe and what the home sells for at the auction (however, some states have laws against deficiency judgments).

A secured loan includes two components:

Personal responsibility Just like with any other obligation, you are personally liable for secured debt. You have a duty to make the required payment to the creditor. If this personal liability falls among the categories of debt that bankruptcy allows for discharge, Chapter 7 bankruptcy eliminates it. The creditor cannot file a lawsuit against you to recoup the debt once your personal liability has ended.

Chapter 7 bankruptcy options

If you qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, you can do the following with property used to secure debts:

Let the bank receive the property back. By giving up the property and paying off the underlying loan, you can go with no further obligation. All filers have access to this choice.
Keep the house and keep paying the mortgage. As long as your payments are up to date and you have an exemption in place to safeguard your equity, you may continue to be bound by the terms of your contract. The debt is reaffirmed throughout this procedure.
Pay the property’s fair market value. If you can safeguard your equity with an exemption and the property satisfies other restrictions (for example, you cannot redeem real estate), you may keep the property by redeeming it (paying what it is worth in one lump sum payment).

Can You Exempt (Keep) The Equity In Your Property?

When you declare bankruptcy, you can protect some assets, but there are restrictions. The exemptions that your state permits will also determine whether you are eligible to maintain a certain asset. The bankruptcy trustee appointed to your case will sell the asset for the benefit of your creditors if you are unable to preserve all of the equity.

Example. Consider the scenario where you owe $3,000 on a car that is worth $6,000 and have $3,000 in equity, and your state’s vehicle exemption will allow you to save $1,000. Most likely, you wouldn’t be permitted to keep the vehicle. Instead, the trustee would sell it, give you your $1,000 exemption in cash, pay your secured creditor the remaining $3,000 you still owe on it, and then divide the remaining $2,000 (minus the costs of selling and the trustee’s compensation) among creditors.

Even still, borrowers of secured loans frequently owe more than the asset used to secure the loan is worth, which implies that they have no equity in the asset. The trustee won’t be able to sell the property if you don’t own any equity in it or if it is entirely protected by an exemption. By redeeming the item or reaffirming the debt, you might keep the asset.

What Is a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Reaffirmation?

When you reaffirm a debt, you agree that you will still owe it after your bankruptcy case ends. Both the creditor’s lien on the collateral (which gives the creditor the right to take the property if you fail to pay as agreed) and your liability to pay the debt will survive bankruptcy intact.

 

In most cases, it will be as if you never filed for bankruptcy for that debt.

 

Advantages to Reaffirmation in Chapter 7

Reaffirmation provides a sure way to keep collateral as long as you abide by the terms of the reaffirmation agreement and keep up your payments. If you stay current on the payment, the lender won’t be able to take back the property.

 

Reaffirmation also provides an opportunity to negotiate new terms to reduce your payments, your interest rate, or the total amount you will have to pay over time. However, the lender doesn’t have to agree to new terms and most reaffirmation agreements are on the original contract terms.

How Reaffirmation Affects Your Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

Because reaffirmation leaves you personally liable for the debt, you can’t walk away from the debt after bankruptcy. You’ll still be legally bound to pay the deficiency balance even if the property is damaged or destroyed. And because you have to wait eight years before filing another Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, you’ll be stuck with that debt for a long time.

For instance, if you reaffirm your car note and then default on your payments after bankruptcy, the creditor can (and probably will) repossess the car, auction it off, and bill you for the difference between what you owe and what the trustee received at auction.

Example 1. Suppose you owe $25,000 on your car before filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. You most likely will continue to owe $25,000 on your car after you file for bankruptcy (unless you negotiate a lower amount in your reaffirmation agreement). If you can’t keep up your payments and the car is repossessed, you’ll owe the difference between the $25,000 reaffirmation amount and the amount the lender sells the car for at auction, or “deficiency balance,” which will be considerably less than you owe, in most cases). Nearly all states permit a creditor to sue for a deficiency balance. However, about half of the states don’t allow deficiency balances on repossessed personal property if the original purchase price was less than a few thousand dollars.

Example 2. Tasha owes $1,500 on a computer worth $900 and reaffirms the debt for the full $1,500. Two months after bankruptcy, she spills a soft drink ruining the computer. Because she reaffirmed the obligation, she still must pay the creditor the remaining balance.

Restrictions on Reaffirmation

The first step is ensuring the Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee won’t sell your property. If you can’t protect all of the equity with a bankruptcy exemption, the trustee will sell it, pay the lender, give you the exemption amount, and use the remaining proceeds to pay unsecured creditors.

However, if you can protect all of the property equity, you can use a reaffirmation agreement and continue paying on “secured” property that’s encumbered by a lien. You and the creditor must agree to any change in terms.

Also, you or the lender must file the agreement in court as part of the bankruptcy case. The bankruptcy court must review the agreement in a reaffirmation hearing if an attorney does not represent you. If you have a lawyer, the lawyer must sign the agreement and attest that you can afford the payment and that it won’t cause undue financial hardship.

At the hearing, the judge will consider how the reaffirmation might affect your post-bankruptcy budget and whether you can afford the payments. The judge can reject the agreement if it isn’t in your best interest or would create an undue hardship for you or your family.

Reaffirmation agreement rejections occur when it appears that you can’t afford the payments after paying your basic living expenses or if you owe much more on the debt than the property is worth. The bankruptcy judge will make this determination after reviewing the income and expense forms filed with the bankruptcy petition in your case.

When to Enter Into a Reaffirmation Agreement

Sometimes a lender will let you keep a car or other property without filing a reaffirmation agreement as long as you continue making your payment. This is a good way to go because if the lender repossesses the property because you can’t make your payments, or you let the car go back to the lender after an accident, you won’t be responsible for paying anything further.

That won’t be the case if you enter into a reaffirmation agreement. Because reaffirming a debt comes with the disadvantage of leaving you in debt after your bankruptcy case ends, you should consider it only if:

 

  • the creditor insists on it
  • it’s the only way to keep property you need, and
  • you have good reason to believe you’ll be able to pay off the balance.

Reaffirmation might be the only practical way to keep some property types, such as automobiles or your home. Also, reaffirmation can be a sensible way to keep property that is worth significantly more than what you owe on it.

If you decide to reaffirm a debt, it’s usually worth asking the creditor to accept less than you owe as full payment. For most people, it’s not a good idea to reaffirm a debt for more than what it would cost you to replace the property.

Keep Current on Payments You Wish to Reaffirm

If you need the collateral, you’ll want to be current on your payments before filing for bankruptcy to stay on the creditor’s good side. If you fall behind, the creditor can demand that you bring your account current before agreeing to a reaffirmation contract.

Differences Between Collateral and Secured Debt

It’s common to wonder how secured and unsecured debts differ. The answer is simpler than you might think.

When applying for a credit account or taking out a loan, the lender might ask you to put up collateral (valuable property) that it can sell if you fail to pay your bill—especially when borrowing a large sum of money. The collateral assures or guarantees the lender that it will get paid if you stop making your payment as agreed.

Securing a loan with collateral creates a “lien” on the property, a type of ownership interest that remains until the borrower pays off the debt. The lien interest gives a creditor the right to repossess your vehicle if you fail to make your payment. Likewise, if you fall behind on your mortgage, the lien will allow the lender to foreclose on your home.

A bank or creditor who owns a collateralized debt has what is called a “secured debt.” If the bank seeks reimbursement in a bankruptcy case, it will file a “secured claim.” If the bankruptcy trustee sells the property, the trustee must pay the secured lender first before distributing funds to unsecured creditors.

However, not all creditors require a borrower to provide security when making a loan or providing a credit service. An “unsecured” creditor doesn’t have a lien interest in collateral, so it can’t sell the borrower’s property to pay off the debt without doing more.

Credit cards, medical bills, and personal loans, such as payday loans are all examples of unsecured debt. An unsecured creditor can gain a security interest by winning a debt collection lawsuit and recording the money judgment with the local recorder’s office or the appropriate state agency.

Written by Canterbury Law Group

Can You File Bankruptcy on a Car Loan and Keep the Car?

If you have a car loan and want to keep the car after filing bankruptcy, you’ll have to pay for it.

Many people are under the mistaken belief that filing bankruptcy allows you to wipe out an auto loan and keep the vehicle free and clear of any payments. It just isn’t true. Bankruptcy will unwind your obligation to pay back the loan. But if you don’t make the payment, you won’t be driving the car for long. So the short answer is no—you won’t get a free car in bankruptcy.

Even so, it isn’t a given that you’ll lose a car with a car loan, either. In this article, you’ll learn:

  • what happens to car loans in bankruptcy
  • how to keep a financed car in Chapters 7 and 13, and
  • “surrendering” a car you want to return to the lender.

We have many more helpful articles that explain what happens to cars in bankruptcy. Look for links to additional resources at the end of this article.

Bankruptcy Erases Car Loans But Not Car Liens

Bankruptcy works by breaking the contract requiring you to repay the lender for the car loan. You can file for bankruptcy, give the car back to the lender, and not pay anything further on the car loan.

However, if you want to keep a car with a car loan, there’s a catch. Filing for bankruptcy doesn’t eliminate the lien giving the bank the right to take back your car if you don’t pay as agreed. The bank can use the lien to repossess the car once the bankruptcy case is over—or sooner with the court’s permission—even though you erased the debt. So if you want to keep the car, you must pay for it.

How you pay your car loan—and whether you can keep a car if you’re behind on the car loan—will depend on whether you file for Chapter 7 or 13.

Understanding Car Loans and Car Liens Before Bankruptcy

Buying a car is costly, and most people can’t afford to pay for one outright. Instead, borrowers finance the purchase by signing a “promissory note” agreeing to pay back the debt with interest in monthly installments.

Because most car loans involve thousands of dollars, banks minimize risk by requiring the buyer to agree to put up the vehicle as collateral. The additional requirement creates a lien on the car that lets the lender repossess the car if the borrower “defaults” by failing to pay.

In bankruptcy, the lien makes the car loan a “secured debt,” unlike a Visa or Mastercard balance, which would be an “unsecured debt.”

What’s the difference? If you don’t pay an unsecured debt, you don’t have to return the property you purchased, such as the tiki torches and inflatables you charged for your annual luau.

Watch out, though—charging furniture, jewelry, mattresses, electronics, and appliances usually creates a secured debt. Check the contract or receipt to find out.

How to Keep a Car in Bankruptcy Chapters 7 and 13

What you’ll need to do to keep a vehicle with a car loan will depend on the bankruptcy chapter you file.

Keeping a Car After Filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy on a Car Loan

In Chapter 7 bankruptcy, you have two people to please before you can keep your car—the Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee assigned to your case and the car lender. You’ll need to do different things to satisfy each of them.

The bankruptcy trustee won’t take your car if you can protect all vehicle equity with a bankruptcy exemption. So your first step would be figuring out whether you can protect your car’s equity with a motor vehicle exemption. If the motor vehicle exemption isn’t enough to cover your equity, check for a wildcard exemption—many states let bankruptcy filers use both.

If you can protect all of the equity, you can keep the car in Chapter 7 bankruptcy—at least as far as the Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee is concerned. The car lender and the lien associated with the car loan is another matter.

To steer clear of your car lender in Chapter 7 bankruptcy, you must be current on your car loan when you file and remain current after your Chapter 7 case ends. Otherwise, the lender will use the lien rights to repossess the vehicle.

But there are other things you can do to keep a car in Chapter 7 bankruptcy when you have a car loan, such as “redeeming” the car or paying the lender its actual value. Learn about all of your car options in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

Keeping a Car After Filing Chapter 13 Bankruptcy on a Car Loan

If you’re behind on your payments, consider filing for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. You can pay off the vehicle balance over three to five years in a Chapter 13 repayment plan and keep the car.

But if you don’t make the payments, including catching up on any arrearages on the car loan, the lender can repossess your car in Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Learn more about your car in Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

Returning the Vehicle Bankruptcy to Get Out of a Car Loan

Sometimes the best option is returning a vehicle with a car loan to the lender. Then you’ll be out from under the car loan entirely. Many bankruptcy filers will return a fianced car to the lender when they:

  • paid too much for the vehicle
  • can’t afford the monthly payment, or
  • don’t want the vehicle or the car loan associated with it.

If you’re in this situation, you’ll check the box that states that you plan to “surrender the property” when you’re filling out the Statement of Intention for Individuals Filing Under Chapter 7 form. You can also surrender a car with a car loan in Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

Written by Canterbury Law Group

Judgment of Divorce

Married couples always start off with the best intentions and try to make things work during a marriage. Unfortunately, not all marriages are meant to be. When it comes to divorce, it’s also great if a couple can resolve any issues they have informally. But if you and your soon-to-be ex can’t come to an agreement on your own, you might have to go to court to determine who gets what, from the kids to the coffee table.

Here is a quick overview of what you can expect in family court and the final judgment of divorce.

What is a Final Judgment in Divorce Proceedings?

The final judgment in a divorce proceeding is the final ruling that ends the marriage between a married couple. These judgments are rendered by the judge or jury. Once the court reaches this decision, the divorce is granted and finalized. In order to get a final judgment in a divorce, a married couple must go through the family court process.

Family Court and Final Judgment: The Basics

The vast majority of divorce cases reach some sort of settlement, whether through informal negotiation between the spouses (and their attorneys) or through more structured proceedings such as mediation or collaborative law.

But, in some divorce cases, no full settlement can be reached. This is usually because the spouses are too far apart in some or all of their respective wishes. They may not agree on a equitable solution for issues such as child custody, child support, and property division.

In these situations, the divorce will be handled in civil or “family” court, at the county/district branch of state court where the divorce petition was filed. A single judge usually presides over the case and issues a final judgment of divorce, although one or both spouses may have the right to request a jury trial.

The Court Process: Evidence and Arguments

In family court, attorneys for each spouse present evidence and arguments related to the divorce on issues like child custody and visitation, child and spousal support, and property division. Evidence in a divorce trial can come in the form of:

  • Testimony from the spouses;
  • Witness testimony — including a guardian ad litem, a neutral third party who advocates for and represents the child(ren) in court, and expert witnesses (financial analysts, property valuation experts, etc.); and
  • Documents — including records related to marital property and finances.

As each side presents its own evidence and arguments, the other side has an opportunity to question witnesses and challenge evidence through “cross-examination” — challenging the witness’s story, testing their credibility, disputing documents, and otherwise attempting to discredit or discount witnesses and evidence.

The Court Process: Final Judgment of Divorce

After hearing and examining all evidence, the judge (or jury) will issue a final ruling resolving the divorce and all surrounding issues. Once the judge reaches a decision, they grant the divorce and enter a judgment finalizing the divorce and all related issues.

This judgment dictates a number of things about the now-divorced couple’s rights and obligations, including:

  • Division of the couple’s marital property, debts, and resolution of other financial matters;
  • Child custody, living arrangements, and a visitation schedule; and
  • Child support and spousal support (alimony): who pays, who receives, how much, when, etc.

Once a judgment is entered, either or both spouses can appeal a trial court judge’s decision to a higher (“appellate” or “appeals”) court, although it is unusual for an appeals court to overturn a judge or jury’s decision in a divorce case.

Written by Canterbury Law Group

Arizona DUI Laws 2023

Arizona DUI Laws

“Driving Under the Influence” (DUI) is the official term used in Arizona while some other states use the term “Driving While Intoxicated” (DWI.) The two terms have become synonyms for each other and refer to drugged or drunk driving.

The DUI laws of Arizona explicitly forbid the operation of any form of motor transport in these circumstances:

  • When the operator of the vehicle has a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.8 or more
  • When they are under the influence of alcohol or drugs if the driver is to the slightest degree impaired

There is what is known as a “Not a drop” law in the state of Arizona. It states drivers under the of twenty-one years cannot drive with any amount of detectable alcohol in their body. Colloquially this is known as a “baby DUI.”

Incidentally the law includes what is defined as being in control of a motorized or electric vehicle as well as operating or driving a vehicle. The purpose is to prevent drunk driving prior to it commencing.

Arizona DUI Penalties

In Arizona, the circumstances of each case will determine the penalties for a DUI including the amount of previous convictions the individual may have as well as the blood alcohol content of the driver.

Impaired DUI (Blood Alcohol Content ranging from .08 to .149%)

  • Jail: The minimum term is 10 days but is subject to all but 1 day or twenty-four hours may be suspended on the completion of screening for alcohol
  • Fines: Minimum of $1,480
  • Suspended License: Minimum for 90 days
  • Ignition Interlock Device: 1-year mandatory (with a possible 6-month reduction)

Extreme DUI (Blood Alcohol Content ranging from .15 to .199%)

  • Jail: The minimum term is 10 days but is subject to all, but 9 days may be suspended on the completion of screening for alcohol
  • Fines: Minimum of $3,000
  • Suspended License: Minimum for 90 days
  • Ignition Interlock Device: 1-year mandatory

Super Extreme DUI (BAC of at least .20%)

  • Jail: The minimum term is 45 days but is subject to all, but 14 days may be suspended on the completion of screening for alcohol
  • Fines: Minimum of $3,250
  • Suspended License: Minimum for 90 days
  • Ignition Interlock Device: A mandatory 1-year term as a minimum

Further DUIs

Unquestionably Arizona has very harsh penalties for repeat offenders:

Impaired DUI

  • Jail: The minimum term is 90 days and 30 of those must be served on consecutive terms but is subject to all, but 30 days may be suspended on the completion of screening for alcohol
  • Fines: Minimum of $3,000
  • Suspended License: At least 1 year however an individual may be able to obtain what is known as a restricted license after forty-five days if an ignition interlock device is installed
  • Ignition Interlock Device: A mandatory 1-year term as a minimum

Extreme DUI

  • Jail: Minimum of 120 days (60 served consecutively)
  • Fines: Minimum of $3,250
  • Suspended License: At least 1 year however an individual may be able to obtain what is known as a restricted license after forty-five days if an ignition interlock device is installed
  • Ignition Interlock Device: A mandatory 1-year term as a minimum

Super Extreme DUI

  • Jail: Minimum of 180 days (90 served consecutively)
  • Fines: Minimum of $4,250
  • Suspended License: At least 1 year however an individual may be able to obtain what is known as a restricted license after forty-five days if an ignition interlock device is installed
  • Ignition Interlock Device: A mandatory 1-year term as a minimum

You should also know a third DUI represents a felony offense and carries a mandatory and minimum prison sentence of four months as license revocation for a minimum of one year, an IID requirement for a minimum of two years and in excess of $4,000 in assessments and fines.

Refusing a Breath Or Blood Test in Arizona And Implied Consent

The “implied consent” law on the books in Arizona states following a DUI arrest all drivers must, without exception, provide a breath or blood test. To refuse to do so will be penalized thus:

  • Suspended License 1st offense: 1 year
  • Suspended License 2nd offense: 2 year

While DUI laws tend to be similar across the United States, drivers should be aware of important legal distinctions from state to state. Arizona DUI laws are no exception. As a driver, you should already understand that operating a vehicle while impaired by drugs or alcohol could lead to serious legal ramifications.

This article explains Arizona DUI laws and what you should expect if charged there.

Arizona DUI Laws

According to Arizona’s DUI laws, it is illegal to drive or be in physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of drugs or alcohol. In addition, police officers can charge you with a DUI for a blood-alcohol content level (BAC) of 0.08% or greater. In some circumstances, such as driving a commercial vehicle, your BAC can be much lower and qualify as a DUI.

Overall, Arizona has a very strict approach to DUIs, referring to the act as the equivalent of a “violent crime.” As such, the state’s penalties even for a first-time offense could be seen as especially harsh compared to a state like California, where you could be a third-time DUI offender and not necessarily serve mandatory jail time.

These distinctions are broken down further in the following sections.

Arizona’s DUI Definition

First, there is a special emphasis in Arizona, as dictated by ARS § 28-1381, on the physical act of operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. In Arizona, “under the influence,” should be understood as clearly impaired by a substance, legal or otherwise, to the point where you are not capable of safely operating any vehicle.

So if you are not capable of safely controlling your car or truck, but make any identifiable attempt to do so, you are guilty of a DUI according to Arizona law. Understanding this emphasis is important because you need not be driving to get charged with a DUI.

You Can Get an Arizona DUI Without Actually Driving

Even if you are not driving, any action that could be construed as “actual physical control” of your vehicle still violates Arizona’s DUI laws. Actual physical control goes into effect when you are deemed to be the primary party in control of your vehicle. Even if you aren’t on the road, actions like turning the headlights on, rolling the windows up or down or putting keys in the ignition or actions that dictate you are in actual physical control.

Please also note that you can still get charged with a DUI within two hours of operating a vehicle if your BAC is still above the legal limit during that time. That means even if you are at home, having driven an hour ago, you may still face charges for having too recently driven your car with a BAC above the legal limit.

How Arizona Law Defines “Under the Influence”

In Arizona, you are under the influence if you are impaired by a substance to the point it interferes with your ability to drive or operate a vehicle safely. This is typically defined according to reaching and exceeding a certain BAC limit. The standard is 0.08%, however it drops to 0.04% for commercial driving.

Arizona’s “Not A Drop” Law

The “not a drop” law, sometimes referred to as a baby DUI, concerns Arizona’s zero tolerance for underage driving and driving. If you are under 21 and drive with a BAC greater than 0.00%, you are guilty of a DUI.

A driver can have a detectable amount of alcohol in your system even after a few sips of beer or wine, making it very easy for underage drivers to violate this law and get into trouble.

Arizona “Shelter Rule” Defense

As stringent as Arizona’s laws can be about what falls under the definition of a DUI offense, the state also worried that some drivers, fearful of getting caught, would risk driving while intoxicated in the hopes of reaching home, a friend’s house, or hotel. And as parking isn’t necessarily an immediate defense against a DUI, some may have felt even more inclined to risk their safety and others by driving.

With this concern in mind, Arizona passed the “Shelter Rule” law, a temporary shelter defense against a DUI charge. Under this law, the act of pulling onto the side of the road or into a parking lot could be argued as relinquishing physical control, as you are avoiding the act of drunk driving.

There are a couple of factors that a judge or jury would need to take into consideration when deciding if a driver is in actual physical control:

  • Are they behind the wheel? A person asleep in the back seat does not have the level of control over their vehicle that someone passed out behind the wheel might.
  • Do they have keys in the ignition? While a lack of keys might help determine physical control in certain cases, many new vehicles do not use keys to start the ignition.
  • What is the time of day? It makes the most sense to pull over and “sleep it off” if the driver does so in the middle of the night.

The more favorable these mitigating factors in demonstrating the relinquishment of actual physical control, the less likely you are to be convicted of a DUI.

Arizona DUI Penalties

Although the Arizona DUI laws label most offenses as misdemeanors, the consequences are still serious, even for the very first time. The severity of penalties also increase when drivers move from a simple DUI to an extreme or aggravated DUI.

Arizona’s Aggravated DUI Penalties

In Arizona, you have committed an aggravated DUI if you:

  • Are arrested of a DUI with a suspended, revoked or canceled license.
  • Commits a third DUI offense within 84 months of a previous conviction.
  • Commit a DUI offense while a person under 15 is in the car.
  • Has an ignition interlock device (IID) in place, but refuses to submit to a BAC test.

While most DUIs can be charged as a misdemeanor, an aggravated DUI is a felony that carries stiff punishment if convicted. Penalties include up to two years in prison, loss of your driver’s license for a year, mandatory entrance into an alcohol education, treatment and screening program, addition of a certified IID in your vehicle, and mandatory community service.

Arizona’s Extreme DUI Penalties

An extreme DUI refers to drivers with a BAC level exceeding 0.15%. The first time this happens, drivers serve a mandatory jail sentence of at least 30 days without the eligibility of probation or a suspended sentence. Additionally, they must pay a minimum fine of $2,500. Any vehicle you drive must get an IID installed, and you are required to enroll in an alcohol screening, education and treatment program.

While the extreme DUI has harsher punishments than a standard DUI charge, it still gets classified as a misdemeanor.

For the second offense and beyond, the punishments become even more severe. Your license gets automatically revoked for a year, and you face a minimum jail sentence of 120 days. In addition to the mandatory IID and alcohol screening, education, and treatment program, you must also perform community service.

It’s important to remember that the severity of subsequent DUI charges increases the closer they occur together; typically, the escalation in severity refers to multiple convictions happening within a seven-year period.

Implied Consent and Refusing a Blood or Breath Test in Arizona

According to ARS § 28-1321, the “implied consent affidavit,” is served to any driver suspected of a DUI offense where they refuse to or are for whatever reason cannot submit to testing that determines their blood alcohol concentration or drug content. This affidavit is the equivalent of a DUI citation.

For this reason, all drivers are required to submit to testing. The first time a driver refuses, their driving privileges get suspended for a year; a second refusal within 84 months of the first will cause a two-year suspension.

Speak With One Of Our DUI Attorneys In Scottsdale

Canterbury Law Group’s DUI Lawyers in Phoenix and Scottsdale will defend your case with personal attention and always have you and your best interests in mind. Call today for an initial consultation!

We are experienced criminal defense attorneys and will fight for you to obtain the best possible outcome. Our firm will rigorously represent you, so you can get on with your life. Call today for an initial consultation! 480-744-7711 or [email protected]

*This information is not intended to be legal advice. Please contact Canterbury Law Group today to learn more about your personal legal needs.

Written by Canterbury Law Group

First Degree Murder and Second Degree Murder, Homicide and Penalties Definitions

First Degree Murder and Second Degree Member

Homicide refers to the intentional or accidental killing of a human being by another person.

Read on to discover the many types of killings that are typically categorized as second-degree murder, along with examples of each form of killing.

Without Premeditation Intentional Murders

These kind of murders require no strategy on the side of the perpetrator. At the time of the murder, the killer intended to kill the victim, whereas before to the murder, the perpetrator had no intention to commit murder.

For instance, Adam and Bill are neighbors, and they’ve been arguing about the fence separating their houses recently. Adam pays Bill a visit to discuss the issue, and while there, he suddenly grabs the shotgun hanging above the fireplace and fatally shoots Bill.

Adam did not intend to murder Bill when he went to Bill’s residence on that day, so there was no premeditation. Adam had every intention of murdering Bill at the time he squeezed the trigger. Prosecutors would likely prosecute him with second-degree murder under these conditions.

If, on the other hand, Adam murders Bill during a sudden argument that was provoked, he would likely be charged with manslaughter. The premise is that if Adam is motivated by “hot of passion,” the moral responsibility is less.

Intent to Inflict Only Serious Physical Harm

The second circumstance for second-degree murder is when the criminal wants to cause merely substantial bodily damage but is aware that death may ensue from the conduct. Adam grabs a shovel and whacks Bill in the head with all of his power instead of shooting him in the situation described above. Adam did not plan to murder Bill when he struck him with the shovel, but he was aware that a blow to the head carried a high risk of death. Adam’s killing of Bill in this manner would be categorized as second-degree murder.

Extreme Callousness Towards Human Life

The third major type of second-degree murder happens when a victim dies due to the perpetrator’s excessive disregard for human life. Extreme indifference typically entails a complete disregard for the chance that an action would harm someone.

Consider, returning to Adam and Bill, that instead of bashing Bill over the head with a shovel, Adam pulls a rifle and fires wildly at a throng of neighbors who have gathered to watch Adam and Bill argue. Adam didn’t necessarily intend to kill anyone, but he also didn’t consider the harm he could inflict to those in the crowd. This is evidence of Adam’s terrible disregard for human life. If one of Adam’s bullets impacted and killed a member of the crowd, Adam has likely committed second-degree murder.

Felony Murder

Some states additionally consider homicides that occur during the commission of another felony as second-degree murders, although other states classify such homicides as first-degree murders. It is also crucial to know that a person might be convicted of felony murder even if they did not kill somebody themselves.

For instance, if Adam and Bill enter a convenience store with the intention of robbing it at gunpoint (which is a felony), and Adam ends up shooting the store owner, a jury could find Bill (who did not shoot anyone) guilty of murder on the grounds that he was involved in the original felony when the killing occurred.

Murders are the most severe homicides because they carry the harshest penalties. Other types of homicide have diminished levels of intent. These include manslaughter, reckless homicide, negligent homicide, and vehicular homicide. Rarely, a homicide is deemed legally justifiable for self-defense or other reasons and is not prosecuted as a crime.

Families who have lost a loved one may pursue monetary compensation outside of the criminal court system. This takes place in civil court with a wrongful death claim.

This article examines homicide kinds, when a homicide is regarded legally justifiable, and when civil liability for wrongful death may be incurred.

  • Murder
  • Manslaughter
  • Legal Homicide
  • Illustrations of Homicide
  • Related Claim: Unjustified Death

Murder

Murder is the most serious criminal homicide charge. State statutes typically classify different degrees of wrongfulness for murder. The standard definition of first-degree murder is a killing that is both intentional and premeditated.

The requirement for premeditation does not require proof of sophisticated or extensive planning. Courts have determined that premeditation may have occurred after only a few seconds of deliberation and thought.

Similarly, the requirement of intent can be flexible. In order to convict a defendant of first-degree murder, a jury need not determine that the accused intended to cause death. In lieu of this, the prosecution may demonstrate that the defendant intended to cause serious bodily injury or death while attempting to commit another felony.

Additionally, intent need not be directed at a particular individual. If someone planned to kill one person, but unintentionally killed someone else, the murder was still purposeful and premeditated. A killer who brings a poisoned lunch to his victim, only for it to be consumed by someone else, could still be convicted on a first-degree murder conviction.

Depending on the state’s laws, the defendant may be prosecuted with second-degree murder or voluntary manslaughter in the absence of premeditation.

Manslaughter

Manslaughter is classified as either voluntary or involuntary. The main distinction between manslaughter and murder is the killer’s mental state, or mens rea. Some states characterize this state of mind as “under the impact of intense emotional discomfort” resulting from provocation. The state of Texas defines manslaughter as the “reckless” killing of another person.

Voluntary Manslaughter

When a person commits voluntary manslaughter, he or she had no prior intent to kill. It is possible that the murder occurred “in the heat of passion” and without premeditation. An example would be a spouse who committed murder “in the heat of passion” after discovering their partner in bed with another person.

Various states have different laws. This crime could be considered second-degree murder in several places.

Unwillful Manslaughter

In some states, unintentional manslaughter is defined as involuntary manslaughter or negligent homicide. In these instances, the perpetrator killed the victim unintentionally as a result of engaging in risky or criminally negligent behavior. This applies to defendants who should have known that their actions were risky or negligent, as well as those who, like parents, owed the victim a special duty of care.

Examples of negligent homicide deaths that result from:

  • Operating a hazardous amusement park attraction with faulty safety equipment
  • Refusing to provide medical attention to a plainly ill and suffering child
  • Leaving a loaded firearm unlocked and within reach of a youngster in the home is prohibited.
  • Driving under the influence (in some states – other states create a specific definition for these crimes)

Reckless or Negligent Homicide

Because different states give equivalent criminal accusations different names. Reckless homicide and negligent homicide are the favored contemporary words since they define the killer’s mental state or mens rea. These accusations require either showing the defendant knew the lethal activities were dangerous and could cause harm, or that the defendant breached a duty of care or specific responsibility owed to the victim. These charges are regularly utilized in jurisdictions where voluntary and involuntary manslaughter charges have been removed from the penal code.

Vehicular Homicide

When the driver of a car, boat, jet ski, snowmobile, or ATV causes the death of another person, they may be charged with vehicular homicide. Different states define and subcategorize this offense in different ways.

In most cases, motor accidents are not charged as first- or second-degree murder since the driver did not intend to kill anyone. Many fatal car accidents are just that – accidents. These catastrophic situations are not followed by criminal charges. The majority of homicides that result in criminal prosecution are caused by reckless or irresponsible driving. As examples of vehicular homicide, consider the following:

  • Committing a misdemeanor traffic infraction, such as failing to stop at a stop sign
  • Driving at an excessive rate of speed, including street racing
  • Operating a motor vehicle when impaired by drugs or alcohol
  • Eluding law enforcement or triggering a high-speed pursuit
  • Failing to stop and offer aid after a crash (a “hit and run”) (a “hit and run”)

Justifiable Homicide

Some killings that would be considered murder or manslaughter under the law are not prohibited. These are commonly referred to as “justifiable homicide,” and a classic example is killing in self-defense or in defense of another person.

A homicide is considered justifiable if state law permits the use of fatal force in self-defense. When confronted with a serious danger of bodily injury, such as rape, armed robbery, or murder, most state laws permit homicide in self-defense or in defense of another.

Justifiable homicide is a rare occurrence. In an examination of more than 4,500 handgun homicide cases from FBI files, just around 7 percent of murders were deemed justifiable. If the killer was white and the victim was black, and if they resided in a state with a Stand Your Ground statute, a murder is almost twice as likely to be deemed justifiable (13.6%), according to the report.

Killings committed by police officers in the line of duty are frequently viewed as justifiable. There have been a few high-profile incidents of police killings that have resulted in criminal charges, most notably the Derek Chauvin case, although these prosecutions represent a tiny percentage of the number of people killed by police each year. There were 1,021 fatal police shootings in 2020, with black and Hispanic victims being approximately twice as likely to be killed.

Related Wrongful Death Claims

Regardless of the form of homicide, wrongful death claims could be pursued in civil court. The suspected culprit may be sued by the victim’s family even if they were not convicted of murder in a criminal proceeding. The threshold of proof for a wrongful death case is substantially lower than the criminal standard of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Wrongful death lawsuits result in awards of monetary damages rather than criminal punishment. This is exemplified in the famous case of O.J. Simpson was held civilly liable for the killings of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her houseguest Ron Goldman. A Los Angeles criminal court had earlier acquitted Simpson of murder, but a civil court jury held him financially culpable and sentenced him to pay $33.5 million in damages.

Sometimes civil proceedings for wrongful death precede criminal trials. After the death in 2019 of Elijah McClain, who died in police custody following a disputed arrest in Aurora, Colorado, the phrase is used. Local prosecutors initially declined to file charges against any of the participating cops or paramedics. The parents of McClain filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the city, and the local administration agreed to a $15 million settlement. Much later, criminal charges were filed after political pressure prompted a new inquiry. A grand jury indicted three Aurora police officers and two paramedics in September 2021 on charges relating to McClain’s death.

Intentional Murder Using a Vehicle

Despite the fact that vehicular homicides are typically inadvertent and are not charged as murder, some killers use their vehicles as their preferred weapon for purposeful kills.

In a number of high-profile incidents in recent years, cars purposely struck pedestrians on the sidewalk or protestors at a demonstration. Typically, the intentional use of a vehicle to cause bodily harm is prosecuted as murder.

Euthanasia or Suicide Assisted by a Physician

Physician-assisted suicide is the contentious practice of supplying terminally ill patients with a deadly dose of medication that enables them to end their lives without suffering. This method is frequently wrongly referred to as “euthanasia,” but it is not homicide because the deceased makes the ultimate decision to die.

In the 1990s, this subject was brought into the national forefront when Dr. Jack Kevorkian was tried four times in Michigan for helping suicides. None of these first four trials resulted in a conviction. In 1998, he delivered a lethal injection to a terminally ill ALS patient and permitted a video of the execution to be broadcast nationally.

Consequently, he was tried and found guilty of first-degree murder. In addition to the television broadcast, the televised death differed significantly from the 130 other instances in which he had presided over the death of a patient. In all other instances, the lethal dose was provided but not administered; the patients themselves pressed a button to receive the medications or donned a mask to breath lethal carbon monoxide.

Since then, eight states and the District of Columbia have approved physician-assisted suicide for persons with terminal illnesses who are mentally competent.

The deliberate killing of another person without premeditation is typically referred to as second-degree murder. It is a more serious offense than manslaughter but less serious than first-degree murder. The case proceeds on to sentencing after a jury has found a defendant guilty of second-degree murder. The defendant will find out during this stage what punishments the state or federal government will impose for their crime.

The punishment a person guilty of second-degree murder will get depends on a number of circumstances. The language of the legislation itself, which establishes the penalty, comes first. Second, judges may take into account a variety of aggravating and mitigating circumstances when determining a punishment. The charges that a defendant will be charged with upon being found guilty of second-degree murder will be determined by all of these factors taken together.

The relevant penalties for the offense are often covered in the statutes that specifically forbid second-degree murder. This usually takes the form of a broad time frame, like 15 years to life. However, frequently the conversations don’t provide much precise information regarding the sentences and offer courts considerable discretion in deciding on punishments.

For instance, the federal law that makes second-degree murder a crime mandates that anyone found guilty must serve either a life sentence in prison or a term of years in jail. Due to the ambiguous nature of the sentencing pronouncement, federal judges must apply the Federal Sentencing Guidelines to establish the proper sentence for a person found guilty of second-degree murder.

Other jurisdictions’ laws specify precise penalties for particular offenses. For instance, the Penal Code of California specifies particular minimum sentences for second-degree murder that occurs after shooting a gun from a moving vehicle or when it is committed against a peace officer.

Courts typically consider a few aggravating and mitigating factors in addition to the elements listed in the penal law when deciding what constitutes second-degree murder.

The elements of the crime, the offender’s actions, or their past that make the sentence more severe are referred to as aggravating factors. When mitigating circumstances are present, they frequently persuade the sentencing judge that the defendant should receive a lesser term than they otherwise would.

These variables differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, however most countries look at a few fundamental variables before deciding on penalties.

In the federal system, for instance, a judge may extend a sentence for second-degree murder if the defendant’s actions were particularly heinous, cruel, harsh, or humiliating to the victim. A defendant’s criminal history, whether the offense qualified as a hate crime, and whether the defendant used a weapon while committing the crime are all further aggravating considerations.

Federal mitigating circumstances can include the defendant’s admission of guilt or lack thereof, any physical or mental disorders they may have, their volunteer activities, and their upbringing.

The deliberate killing of another person without premeditation is typically referred to as second-degree murder. It is a more serious offense than manslaughter but less serious than first-degree murder. The case proceeds on to sentencing after a jury has found a defendant guilty of second-degree murder. The defendant will find out during this stage what punishments the state or federal government will impose for their crime.

The punishment a person guilty of second-degree murder will get depends on a number of circumstances. The language of the legislation itself, which establishes the penalty, comes first. Second, judges may take into account a variety of aggravating and mitigating circumstances when determining a punishment. The charges that a defendant will be charged with upon being found guilty of second-degree murder will be determined by all of these factors taken together.

The relevant penalties for the offense are often covered in the statutes that specifically forbid second-degree murder. This usually takes the form of a broad time frame, like 15 years to life. However, frequently the conversations don’t provide much precise information regarding the sentences and offer courts considerable discretion in deciding on punishments.

For instance, the federal law that makes second-degree murder a crime mandates that anyone found guilty must serve either a life sentence in prison or a term of years in jail. Due to the ambiguous nature of the sentencing pronouncement, federal judges must apply the Federal Sentencing Guidelines to establish the proper sentence for a person found guilty of second-degree murder.

Other jurisdictions’ laws specify precise penalties for particular offenses. For instance, the Penal Code of California specifies particular minimum sentences for second-degree murder that occurs after shooting a gun from a moving vehicle or when it is committed against a peace officer.

Courts typically consider a few aggravating and mitigating factors in addition to the elements listed in the penal law when deciding what constitutes second-degree murder.

The elements of the crime, the offender’s actions, or their past that make the sentence more severe are referred to as aggravating factors. When mitigating circumstances are present, they frequently persuade the sentencing judge that the defendant should receive a lesser term than they otherwise would.

These variables differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, however most countries look at a few fundamental variables before deciding on penalties.

In the federal system, for instance, a judge may extend a sentence for second-degree murder if the defendant’s actions were particularly heinous, cruel, harsh, or humiliating to the victim. A defendant’s criminal history, whether the offense qualified as a hate crime, and whether the defendant used a weapon while committing the crime are all further aggravating considerations.

Federal mitigating circumstances can include the defendant’s admission of guilt or lack thereof, any physical or mental disorders they may have, their volunteer activities, and their upbringing.

Get Legal Help Against Homicide Criminal Charges

Any crime that satisfies the legal threshold of homicide is a serious offense. Defenses in homicide trials are difficult and need much planning. Consult with an expert criminal defense attorney if you’ve been charged with a homicide-related crime, or any felony for that matter.

Need A Criminal Defense Lawyer In Scottsdale or Phoenix?

Canterbury Law Group’s criminal defense lawyers in Phoenix and Scottsdale will defend your case with personal attention and always have you and your best interests in mind when offering legal solutions. Call today for an initial consultation! We handle criminal defense cases in all areas of Phoenix including Mesa, Tempe, Chandler, Maryville, Apache Junction, and more.

We are experienced criminal defense attorneys and will fight for you to obtain the best possible outcome. Our firm will rigorously represent you, so you can get on with your life. Call today for an initial consultation! 480-744-7711 or [email protected]

*This information is not intended to be legal advice. Please contact Canterbury Law Group today to learn more about your personal legal needs.

Written by Canterbury Law Group

What Is Divorce Good For

Most people who are thinking about getting a divorce are aware of what to expect. They have seen divorces in the movies and frequently have at least a few personal acquaintances who have gone through divorce. Even with this “second-hand” knowledge, going through your own divorce is one of the scariest things you can do in life.

You may be facing the end of one of your most important relationships ever, and on top of that, you have to start planning for unpleasant things like the division of assets and finding new housing. In many situations, there is also the sad possibility of losing daily contact with your children.

Divorce and predictability don’t mix. But if you go into your divorce with reasonable expectations, you’ll have the best chance of being happy with the outcome. As a result, it’s a good idea to be aware of what a divorce can and cannot achieve for you. What therefore is there to gain from divorce?

Real Estate Division

The marital property will be divided by the divorce court in the most reasonable manner. Most states will not include any property acquired before the marriage, by gift, or through inheritance in this divide.

This entails a 50/50 split of the property obtained by the partners during the marriage in some states (community property states). Other states (those without a community property system) will try to divide the property fairly by looking into the couple’s individual financial situations, the length of the marriage, the standard of living during that time, and other pertinent factors.

It is advisable to discuss the split of property with your soon-to-be ex-spouse because it is never predictable. Having legal representation will aid in the negotiation and settlement processes as well. For instance, you might decide that, while genuinely wanting to stay in the family home, you must continue running your business. As a result, you might decide to prioritize the business over the home. You can try to reach a mutually agreeable property division arrangement with your spouse in this way.

Assistance Obligations

The outcome of a divorce case can influence a couple’s support obligations. This may take the shape of spousal support and child support (also called “alimony”).

Although there may be some case-by-case variations, state law currently mainly determines how much child support must be paid. Slowly but surely, several states are working to enact laws that restrict deviance from the norm. Ordered custody arrangements may affect child support orders. In general, spousal support is heavily influenced by the specifics of each divorce and the financial situation of the separating couple. Therefore, it is once again challenging to anticipate a court’s final support decision.

Visitation and Custody of Children

When there are children between the parties, divorce can also help determine child custody, timesharing arrangements, and parenting schedules in addition to the division of assets. This is also everything but expected. The “best interests” of the child are supposedly promoted by a collection of considerations that courts frequently attempt to consider when making decisions, however these factors might differ from case to case and court to court.

Furthermore, during tense custody disputes, courts typically hear and see only the worst in people. In light of their constrained “view” of the parents’ lives, a divorce court might not necessarily decide on custody in the “optimal” way. Again, in this situation, bargaining and settlement are key choices to consider. A cooperative child custody arrangement will be advantageous to all parties engaged in the divorce, especially the kids.

Ensure Accurate and Equal Division

An exact or mathematically equal distribution of property and parenting time cannot be achieved through divorce. Since no two individuals, marriages, or divorces are alike. The judge who issues a divorce decree must choose wisely given the time and information at hand. You may need to make some concessions on some of your desires, and the choice may not always be the most just one that could have been made.

Divorce courts frequently need to make the most of bad situations. For instance, when one parent resides in Cheyenne, Wyoming, and the other in Kalamazoo, Michigan, a satisfactory custody agreement is impossible.

Maintain Good Relations

Even while a court can determine the terms of child custody and visitation, the judge will not always be present when it is time for one parent to pick up the children or send them to spend the weekend with the other parent. The court will not be present to watch that they don’t insult the other parent in front of the kids. A court order is ultimately simply a piece of paper. To carry out the provisions of the custody and visitation order, the parents must continue communicate with each other civilly.

Your obligation to your children does not end with your divorce. In the best interests of the kids, this duty also entails courteous communication with the other parent. When there is significant conflict between the parents, most courts will take whatever action they can, such as limiting in-person interactions wherever possible. Examples of this include arranging for parents to pick up or drop off children at school or church so that they won’t have to interact with one another, or if a facility is available to handle exchanges when domestic violence is present.

Keep Your Current Standard of Living

You should also be aware that a divorce court cannot raise your pay in order to stop a decline in your standard of living after a divorce. Unfortunately, maintaining two separate residences is simply more expensive than living together and splitting costs with another person. Your level of life will alter after a divorce, and the court can do very little, if anything, to prevent this.

Fix Emotional Problems

Finally, a court will not be able to hold your ex-spouse accountable or ethically defend you for all the wrongdoings that took place during your marriage. Additionally, the divorce procedure won’t make your emotional wounds better or even eliminate the need for you to grieve the broken relationship. Although you can get help from therapists and support groups, that is your responsibility.

Written by Canterbury Law Group

Voluntary Manslaughter

What Is Felony Murder

Voluntary manslaughter is commonly defined as an intentional killing in which the offender had no prior intent to kill, such as a killing that occurs in the “heat of passion.” The circumstances leading up to the killing must have caused a reasonable person to become emotionally or mentally disturbed; otherwise, the killing may be charged as first- or second-degree murder.

For instance, when Dan returns home, he discovers his wife in bed with Victor. In a fit of rage, Dan grabs a golf club from next to the bed and smacks Victor in the skull, instantly killing him.

On the spectrum of homicides, this offense falls midway between murder and the excusable, justifiable, or privileged taking of life that does not constitute a crime, such as self-defense. There are a variety of potential sentences and consequences for voluntary manslaughter, and the sentence is frequently determined by the judge.

Voluntary manslaughter is distinct from involuntary manslaughter and is defined differently depending on the state in which the crime is committed. Involuntary manslaughter, on the other hand, occurs when someone dies as a result of a non-felonious illegal conduct committed by the defendant, or as a result of the defendant’s negligence or recklessness.

A homicide attributed to “passion”

In accordance with federal law, voluntary manslaughter is the unlawful killing of a human without malice during a sudden quarrel or a fit of rage.

The precise meaning of the term “hot of passion” varies depending on the context, but it generally alludes to an irresistible emotion that a normally sensible person would feel under the same circumstances. This concept of an unstoppable drive contradicts with the concept of premeditation in first-degree murder, because demonstrating one necessarily eliminates the other.

For instance, if Adam witnesses a complete stranger, Bob, desecrate a holy monument and then kills Bob in a fit of rage, the state would likely charge Adam with voluntary manslaughter rather than murder. If, on the other hand, Adam harbored a long-standing, uncontrolled hatred for Bob due to Bob’s criticism of Adam’s faith, and he hid and waited for Bob to damage the monument with the goal to kill Bob, then Adam would likely be charged with murder.

Defenses to Voluntary Homicide

The potential defenses for voluntary manslaughter are comparable to those for other types of homicide. A defendant charged with voluntary manslaughter may attempt to demonstrate that they did not commit the crime, that their acts were justified, or that their conduct does not fulfill the criteria for voluntary manslaughter. There may be further defenses available, depending on the applicable state law. The state could conceivably charge the defendant with voluntary manslaughter if he or she kills in self-defense but was the first aggressor in the situation that led to the homicide. In addition, voluntary manslaughter might comprise homicides committed based on the defendant’s sincere but irrational assumption that deadly force is required.

State Mandatory Manslaughter Statutes

Different state statutes define voluntary manslaughter differently. A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (voluntary manslaughter) in New York if they meant to cause the death of another, but did so while under the influence of significant emotional disturbance.

Some states, such as Texas, do not have a specific definition for voluntary manslaughter; rather, murder can be reduced to second-degree provided the defendant demonstrates the affirmative defense of sudden passion. as a homicide committed under the false impression that the killing was justifiable. Certain states define voluntary manslaughter based on a list of specified situations. For instance, the purposeful death of an unborn child is considered voluntary manslaughter in Illinois.

Obtain legal assistance for your voluntary manslaughter case.

If you are facing allegations as serious as voluntary manslaughter, it is probable that you have already consulted with an experienced criminal defense counsel. If you haven’t already, you should do so quickly in order to grasp the penalties associated with the charges you’re facing and the viable defenses moving forward. Even for less serious crimes or analyses of family members’ convictions and plea deals, the best course of action is to contact a local criminal defense attorney.

Need A Criminal Defense Lawyer In Scottsdale or Phoenix?

Canterbury Law Group’s criminal defense lawyers in Phoenix and Scottsdale will defend your case with personal attention and always have you and your best interests in mind when offering legal solutions. Call today for an initial consultation! We handle criminal defense cases in all areas of Phoenix including Mesa, Tempe, Chandler, Maryville, Apache Junction, and more.

We are experienced criminal defense attorneys and will fight for you to obtain the best possible outcome. Our firm will rigorously represent you, so you can get on with your life. Call today for an initial consultation! 480-744-7711 or [email protected]

*This information is not intended to be legal advice. Please contact Canterbury Law Group today to learn more about your personal legal needs.

Written by Canterbury Law Group

Involuntary Manslaughter

What Is Felony Murder

An unintentional killing caused by criminal carelessness, recklessness, or committing an offense like a DUI is typically referred to as “involuntary manslaughter.” In contrast to voluntary manslaughter, accidental murder results in the victim’s death. What is involuntary manslaughter and how does it differ from voluntary manslaughter are described below.

Charges of involuntary manslaughter, sometimes known as “criminally negligent homicide,” are frequently brought after a fatal car accident that was caused by a driver who was intoxicated or high. Even though the driver had no intention of killing anyone, the accusation can still be upheld due to their recklessness in doing so while under the influence. Vehicle manslaughter is a distinct category of manslaughter that some states recognize.

The use of a vehicle is not required for involuntary manslaughter. For instance, if a dangerous carnival ride’s operator doesn’t make sure that everyone is buckled in and people die as a result, the operator may be charged with involuntary manslaughter. A building management could also be punished with involuntary manslaughter for willfully failing to install smoke detectors prior to the start of a fatal fire.

Although it is penalized less harshly than other types of homicide, involuntary manslaughter is nonetheless a serious crime. For instance, involuntary manslaughter is classified as a first-degree misdemeanor in Pennsylvania. If the carer of a child under 12 commits this, they are charged with a second-degree crime, which carries a term of up to five years in jail (with a possible prison sentence of up to 10 years upon conviction).

Manslaughter: Voluntary vs. Involuntary

Despite sharing the same name, manslaughter is a rather broad term. Typically, voluntary manslaughter entails a murder committed in the heat of the moment. For instance, it would probably be voluntary manslaughter if Adam suddenly grabs a fire iron and slams Bill to death during a heated argument. Adam shouldn’t be prosecuted with murder, even in the second degree, because his “heat of passion” defense diminishes the moral guilt.

In contrast, involuntary manslaughter refers to unintentional deaths, such as car accidents brought on by drunk drivers. Additionally, killing someone unintentionally while executing a robbery, kidnapping, or other “inherently dangerous” act is typically regarded as murder rather than manslaughter.

An illustration would be when thieves are attempting to flee the scene of a crime and accidentally run over a pedestrian while being chased by police in a high-speed pursuit. Although the pedestrian’s death was unintentional, robbery-related charges for murder would probably be brought against the driver. However, voluntary manslaughter is the unintentional killing that deserves the greatest attention.

Need A Criminal Defense Lawyer In Scottsdale or Phoenix?

Canterbury Law Group’s criminal defense lawyers in Phoenix and Scottsdale will defend your case with personal attention and always have you and your best interests in mind when offering legal solutions. Call today for an initial consultation! We handle criminal defense cases in all areas of Phoenix including Mesa, Tempe, Chandler, Maryville, Apache Junction, and more.

We are experienced criminal defense attorneys and will fight for you to obtain the best possible outcome. Our firm will rigorously represent you, so you can get on with your life. Call today for an initial consultation! 480-744-7711 or [email protected]

*This information is not intended to be legal advice. Please contact Canterbury Law Group today to learn more about your personal legal needs.

Written by Canterbury Law Group

What Is Equitable Distribution And Separate Property In Divorce

Family courts divide property in one of two ways: equitable distribution or community property. Most states divide marital property according to what’s fair, or equitable, for both parties during a divorce. This isn’t the same as equal distribution, however, as the goal of equitable distribution is to consider the needs of each party and the facts of the case.

The equitable distribution of marital assets is determined on a case-by-case basis. It is subject to negotiation between the two parties and the discretion of the judge. If you’re getting divorced in a common law property state (where equitable distribution is recognized), you’ll want to understand how property division will be determined.

This article addresses the two ways in which assets are divided between a couple during their divorce.

Community Property vs. Equitable Distribution: The Basics

In the nine community property states, which include California and Texas, marital property (generally, all property acquired between the date of the marriage and the date of separation) is generally divided fairly equally. This is done regardless of who contributed more to the marriage (whether in regard to money, housekeeping, etc.), who has more separate property, or whether one of the spouses is largely to blame for the divorce.

 

Generally, anything purchased with money earned by either spouse during the marriage is considered community property. Community property is subject to a roughly 50/50 split in a divorce. However, separate property may be established through a written contract. Examples of such contracts are prenuptial agreements or postnuptial agreements, sometimes called antenuptial agreements.

In equitable division property states, courts take a much more delicate approach to property division. Instead of automatically dividing marital property down the middle, these states take a step back and consider what would be the fairest to both parties. This includes consideration of separate property as well as marital property, and the needs and means of each spouse.

For example, consider if one spouse gave up their career in order to stay home and raise children. They now have a difficult time earning a living after the divorce. In this instance, the court may award that party a larger cut of the marital property. Conversely, if one spouse was abusive or otherwise at fault for the failure of the marriage (even in a “no-fault” divorce), the court may award them a smaller percentage of the marital property.

Determining What’s Equitable: Factors Considered

Like community property states, in equitable distribution states, the divorcing couple has an opportunity to reach an agreement on their own (subject to court approval) before the courts intervene. This may take place in a collaborative environment or through the parties’ attorneys. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement about the division of marital property, the courts will use their discretion (within the parameters of state marital property law) in order to reach a resolution.

When courts are tasked with determining the division of assets, they’ll generally consider the following factors under equitable distribution laws:

  • Duration of the marriage;
  • Which spouse has primary custody of minor children;
  • The financial needs and liabilities of each spouse, present and future (for instance, one party may need to invest in a college degree in order to earn a decent wage);
  • The financial well-being and earning power of each spouse, present and future;
  • Amount contributed by each spouse to the combined marital property;
  • Pensions earned by either spouse;
  • Non-monetary contributions to the family (such as child-rearing, unpaid work on the home, etc.);
  • Marital debt accumulated during the duration of the marriage (such as credit card debt);
  • Age, health, and special needs of each spouse;
  • Child support (and/or spousal support) obligations of either spouse for previous relationships;
  • Total fair market value of separate property (again, this isn’t subject to division, but does factor into the overall determination); and
  • Marital misconduct by each spouse (such as gambling debts, extramarital affairs, or instances of domestic violence).

Note that premarital property is not included in equitable distribution. This is because personal property acquired before the marriage is not considered part of the marital estate. Only assets acquired during the marriage are considered part of the marital estate and are subject to equitable distribution.

Individuals often decide to get married after falling in love and realizing they have similar values and life goals. But, romantic ideals aside, marriage is at its core a merger of two entities into a single unit, with shared assets and liabilities. And just as a business merger results in the commingling of assets, so too does marriage (to a degree).

But the question of who owns what typically is addressed only when a married couple decides to call it quits and go their separate ways. Marital property is that which is subject to division upon divorce, but what is separate property in a divorce?

Marital Property vs. Separate Property: The Basics

In order to define separate property in the context of a marriage, we also need to cover the meaning of marital property. Most assets (and debts) acquired during the marriage are considered marital property and thus subject to division in divorce. The way in which marital property is divided depends upon the laws of your state, with a handful of states using the “community property” approach (generally, a 50/50 split).

 

All other property is considered separate property, which means it belongs to just one of the parties in a marriage. When a couple gets divorced, separate property is not subject to division.

 

Assets Considered Separate Property

Unlike marital property, separate property (sometimes called “individual property”) belongs to just one individual before, during, and after the marriage. This mainly consists of that which was acquired before the couple gets married, with a few notable exceptions. Debt also follows these rules; someone who enters a marriage with a heavy debt load typically will be responsible for that debt after the marriage ends.

State laws determine what’s considered separate property, but they’re fairly consistent with one another. Generally, the following is considered separate property:

  • Property owned by one spouse prior to the marriage;
  • Gifts or inheritances received by one spouse prior to or during the marriage;
  • Property acquired by one spouse (in that individual’s name only) during the marriage and not used by the other spouse or for the benefit of the marriage (unless it’s a community property state);
  • Property/debts designated as separate in a legally enforceable contract, such as a prenuptial agreement;
  • Personal injury awards, minus any compensation for lost wages (unless it’s a community property state); and
  • Any property obtained by one party using their separate property assets (such as inheritance funds) with the clear intention of maintaining the acquired property as separate.

Separate property that’s been so commingled with marital property that it’s virtually impossible to identify will be considered marital property (and subject to division) in a divorce. For instance, if marital property (shared income) is used to pay off a car originally purchased by one spouse before the marriage, the car (or a portion of its value) will be considered marital property.

Separate Property: Community Property vs. Common Law States

It’s important to understand how community property states and common law property states differ in how separate property is distinguished. Common law property states, for the most part, automatically define that which is registered in one spouse’s name only as separate property. This isn’t the case in community property states (such as California), where an express, written agreement is required for such a determination.

Additionally, common law property states will take into consideration each spouse’s separate property when determining how to equitably distribute marital property during a divorce. Since community property states split marital property in half, they don’t consider each party’s separate property.

1 11 12 13 14 15 43